Tag Archives: Polish names

What’s in a scientist name? Applying onomastics in scientometrics: the case of Cancer Research

The IREG Observatory on Academic Ranking and Excellence is an international institutional non-profit association of ranking organizations, universities and other bodies interested in university rankings and academic excellence.

Our friend Tania Vichnevskaia of the French National Institute for Health (INSERM) presented the following paper ‘Applying onomastics to scientometrics’ on Monday at IREG International symposium organised by University of Maribor and Shanghai Jiao Tong University.

Download PDF 20150119_IREG2015_INSERM_NamSor_vF.pdf

On this same topic:

About NamSor

NamSor™ Applied Onomastics is a European vendor of Name Recognition Software (NamSor sorts names). NamSor mission is to help understand international flows of money, ideas and people.

NamSor launched FDI Magnet,  a consulting offering to help Investment Promotion Agencies and High-Tech Clusters leverage a Diaspora to connect with business and scientific communities abroad.

Leave a comment

Filed under FDI Magnet, General

About travelling IDEAS and the Global Innovation GAP : South Korea

As a follow-up to the previous post, where we used onomastics to outline Poland as a country very sensitive to external brain drain, we thought useful to show the opposite example of South Korea : a country with a clear innovation strategy and a narrow the gap between Innovation input (education, financing, etc.) and Innovation output (patents, knowledge, etc.)

South Korea was ranked second in the other Global Innovation Index, Blumberg’s 50 Most Innovative Countries. Besides the tremendous energy displayed in the Gangnam Style (강남스타일), we believe one reason for South Korea’s success is that it is less sensitive to “brain drain”. South Korean brain juice goes to South Korea first.

South Korea brain juice top recipients

Reversely some other countries, such as Poland, are bleeding human resources : Polish people (people with polish names) apply for patents in the US, in Germany – before anywhere else.

Polish brain juice top recipients (1993-2013)

Follow us on Twitter

©2013 – NamSor™ – All rights reserved.

Leave a comment

Filed under EthnoViz, FDI Magnet

About travelling IDEAS and the Global Innovation GAP

[Jan 2014, on this topic : NamSor Applied Onomastics to help Lithuania become a talent magnet in BioTech]

Recently, the French-based INSEAD and the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) published The Global Innovation Index 2012 (GII), in collaboration with Alcatel-Lucent, Booz&Co, the Confederation of Indian Industry (CII) and the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre.

Why is innovation is such a strategic issue? For different reasons depending on the country’s economic situation:

– traditional industrial countries would like to maintain their lead : for example Switzerland leads the pack, Germany keeps it’s pace, France is slowly loosing it;

– some countries depend too much on a specific sector and would like to diversify their economy : for example the United-Kingdom relies too much on Financial Services, the Russian Federation relies too much on Oil, Gas and other commodities;

– the emerging countries that have big service and manufacturing industries would like to join the club of advanced countries, through innovation : for example Brazil, China and India.

It’s not just a matter for one country to reach sustainable economic growth : the world’s economic balance is at stake. Should China for example, with its immense trade surpluses and its population, reach the status of a innovative country – the economic balance as well as the strategic balance with its neighbours will have definitively shifted.

The Global Innovation Index 2012 report is an excellent document, very useful to guide governmental policies on innovation. However, we believe something is missing : innovation, like financial resources, moves around. Students, researchers, inventors, entrepreneurs travel. Ideas travel with them and sometimes without them. This is not accounted in the Global Innovation Index report.

On page 6 (and excerpt below), we can see the overall structure of the Global Innovation Index : it distinguishes Innovation Input (for example, Education and Investment) and Innovation Output (for example, Knowledge creation and Online creativity). But what if a country has a good education system, but not enough Investment or a poor Business environment? You guessed right : students, researchers, inventors, entrepreneurs will go somewhere else and their ideas will grow some other country’s Innovation Output. This natural movement can be reinforced by an active brain drain by a country with the means to do it.

We believe Onomastics can help account for those movements of ideas across borders. Below, a (very draft) account of where the Polish brain juice went over the past 20 years.

Polish brain juice top recipients (1993-2013)

Over the past 20 years, Polish ideas went to grow the following countries’ innovation output : the United-States, Germany, Poland, Canada, Great-Britain, Israel, Switzerland, Netherland, France … and some other countries.

Call for collaboration : we would be delighted to work with a Consulting firm, a Think tank or a University to help and prepare a comprehensive report on the global gaps between Innovation input and Innovation output, using onomastics analysis. We believe it will help countries tune their innovation policy and reduce the innovation IO gap : with great business value and strategic benefits in the long term.

Follow us on Twitter

©2013 NameSorts.com – NamSor™ NomTri™

— EXCERPT – slide P6 – Structure of the Global Innovation Index —

Innovation Input

Institutions (Political environment, Regulatory environment, Business environment)
Human capital & research (Education, Tertiary education, Research & development)
Infrastructure (ICT, General infrastructure,Ecological sustainability)
Market sophistication (Credit Investment, Trade & competition)
Business sophistication (Knowledge workers, Innovation linkages, Knowledge absorption)

Innovation Output

Knowledge & technology outputs (Knowledge creationn Knowledge impact, Knowledge diffusion)
Creative outputs (Creative intangibles, Creative goods & services, Online creativity)


Filed under EthnoViz, FDI Magnet